miércoles, 18 de noviembre de 2009


Dear All: I got this email from Teun Van Dijk today and I'd like to share it with you.

Dear friends,

For those who did not see, hear or read the news: Last friday, November
13, Dell Hymes died. Just a few weeks after the death of another great
anthropologist, Levi-Strauss, whose work also influenced the beginnings
of discourse studies and semiotics.
I think it is important to mention this sad event also on this list,
because Dell Hymes was one of the most prominent founders of the
transdiscipline of Discourse Studies. Before the linguists,
psychologists, sociologists and many others, he was the one who since
the early 1960s went beyond the analysis of isolated sentences and
advocated the study of whole "communicative events" - arguably still
the most concise definition of discourse as text & talk in context
- within what he called the ethnography of speaking (and later, with
John Gumperz, the ethnography of communication. Among the vast number
of his studies about the cultural dimensions of discourse, I may merely
point out his contribution to the theory of context, summarized in his
well-known S.P.E.A.K.I.N.G grid -- one of the pillars of discourse
For those who do not know his work, I may refer to the wikipedia
article - and references given there:


martes, 8 de septiembre de 2009


Discourse in Society

You are welcome to visit this generous web page...

And in particular this article called

Critical Discourse Analysis

martes, 28 de julio de 2009


Read and... seen!
The Halliday-Hassan couple.

Delightful, for everyone!

Contributed by Mariel Amez.

I hope everyone likes these recordings
The authors' voices

jueves, 25 de junio de 2009

100 AÑOS... para tod@s

Para ver, para compartir, para disfrutar... el siglo XX en dos minutos.

Link para ver el video en Youtube.

Si lo quieren bajar, usen este link; es más fácil que bajar por Youtube.

¡Gracias Rut por haberme ayudado a subir esta joyita a la web!

martes, 26 de mayo de 2009




American linguistics was born at the beginning of the 20th. Century almost simultaneously with linguistics in Europe. Both shared their orientation towards Structuralism but their origins differ completely.

As we know, European linguistics was born as a reaction against the Historico-comparative approach to language analysis. To this exclusive way of looking at language – the diachronic- Ferdinand de Saussure proposed a synchronic view. Studying the history of languages in Europe and Asia was possible because most languages had written records and this allowed linguists to study them so as to compare and contrast the origin of languages and their evolution.

In America, the situation was different because the languages to be studied- the ones spoken by the Amerindians- did not have writing systems so the information about their culture, history and traditions was passed orally from generation to generation.

Once independence was declared in America in 1776, the original thirteen colonies started the process to “become a nation” and this led them westwards to conquer or to submit the aboriginal communities who had been living there for centuries. In this process, anthropologists played a crucial role since they were the ones who defended the communities not only because of humanitarian reasons but also because they were interested in studying them. These anthropologists were not linguists themselves but they inevitably needed to gather some knowledge about the languages of the communities under study so that they could get information about the issues they wanted to research. This was basal in the birth of American linguistics. On the one hand, since these anthropologists (linguists) could not count on written records, they worked mainly on the transcription of the utterances they heard and they analyzed them formally with the help of the native informants. This means they concentrated on aspects such as sound and grammar, especially syntax. On the other hand, they were worried about trying to relate culture/thought and language as the communities they were working in had a completely different outlook on life that seldom matched what they knew as westerners. On top of that, these communities were being segregated, marginalized or simply killed by the white people whenever they interfered with their expansion plans.

In 1850, the movement westwards dramatically increased because gold was found in the west: it was the popular Gold Rush. In this case the enthusiasm for settling in new lands was coupled by a strong desire for material wealth(Most Hollywood westerns depict these stories… Indians against white men).

In 1860, the Civil War broke out and this prevented intellectuals and scholars from getting involved in their studies. However, the anthropological studies continued because they were far from the battlefields. Franz Boas and Edward Sapir, who developed an extensive literature devoted to the question of language and thought, are memorable examples of this.

In the first quarter of the XX century, World War I was also ravaging Europe and this made many intellectuals migrate. Some of them went to America. That was the way in which many of the European ideas arrived in the new continent. Among these, we may mention De Saussure’s.
Wilhem Wundt, a psychologist favoring mechanicistic views on human behavior in the Pavlovian trend, paved the way for behaviorism. Sigmund Freud’s ideas on introspection and the human mind were also known and they later became the foundation of cognitive studies.

This is the background against which we should place Leonard Bloomfield, whose behavioristic and structural views on language lasted for more than thirty years.

Cris Martínez(2001)

viernes, 22 de mayo de 2009

jueves, 21 de mayo de 2009


Hi Everyone! I am here sharing a very interesting paper on our dearest (and tortured) Mihail Bahktin. Even though the text's aim is not to discuss him for its own sake, the intro is highly illustrative of his approach. Hope you enjoy it!

"Speech Genres, Writing Genres,School Genres and Computer Genres" by Russell A. Hunt
St. Thomas University

viernes, 15 de mayo de 2009


¡HOLA GENTE! hoy les mando una serie de páginas donde pueden encontrar material de consulta acerca de la lengua española. Espero que les sean no solo útiles sino divertidas...

Diccionario de la Real Academia Española y Diccionario Panhispánico de Dudas

La página del idioma español

Wikilengua del español

Manual de español urgente

Gramática y ortografía

Página de la lengua española

buen finde para tod@s y muchas gracias a Juan Ignacio y a Pablo que me enseñaron a insertar vínculos en el blog.

jueves, 14 de mayo de 2009

Otro artículo interesante para CA

Acá va otro artículo muy interesante sobre un tema que ya charlamos que es el de las subordinadas temporales con gerundio. Hay dos versiones, una es el artículo original y otra lo comenta(presentados en ese orden)
Espero que lo disfruten.

"Puntos clave en la explicación de las oraciones subordinadas temporales en la clase de E/L", Esther Arcos

Puntos claves.... (otro acceso)

martes, 12 de mayo de 2009

Artículos para Contrastive Analysis

Hola gente: como ahora el acceso a las pcs es mucho más cotidiano que antes, y aún sabiendo que soy una analfabeta informática de consideración, me animo de todos modos a poner a vuestra disposición este humilde blog, a fin de compartir algunas cosas que si bien no constituyen lecturas "obligatorias", son de todos modos muy útiles para satisfacer algunas inquietudes que me sugirieron en clase.
¡Suerte con la búsqueda y la lectura!

Acá van algunos artículos que me gustaría que leyeran como para revisar la terminología y algunos conceptos necesarios con respecto al español.

a. Guía modular 2: "Elementos idiosincrásicos del español", Dori Lieberman

b. "Organización del componente morfológico y errores del aprendizaje: el caso de la flexión verbal del inglés y el español", Isabel García Parejo y Theophile Ambadiang

c. "La teoría lingüística y la comparación de las lenguas: el caso de los sujetos del español y del inglés", Raquel Fernández Fuertes

Bueno, les debo un par más para la próxima edición.